Well, they obviously did it on purpose. Whether or not it was with malicious intent remains to be seen. But I doubt the reason was to screw their loyal and growing customer base.
Good luck suing them. It's a slippery slope when you can sue a manufacturer because their product is not backwards-compatible with older add-ons. Now if they stated such ahead of time, then failed to deliver, that's fair grounds.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Well, they obviously did it on purpose. Whether or not it was with malicious intent remains to be seen. But I doubt the reason was to screw their loyal and growing customer base.
Good luck suing them. It's a slippery slope when you can sue a manufacturer because their product is not backwards-compatible with older add-ons. Now if they stated such ahead of time, then failed to deliver, that's fair grounds.