Does anyone care that they named it the same way Sony had named their earlier DAPs? The Connect thing was a Sony name for their integrated (yet failed) strategy. It was the name of their music store, too.
With all the law suits going on in this space, I'm really surprised that SanDisk used "Connect". If Apple did it, there'd be all kinds of hater stories about it, like when they used iPhone before getting the rights to do so.
Yeah whatever...but the thing is, why would a company like Sandisk, who could sell a ton of these things to Apple OSX users (who like all sorts of technology, not just Apple-brand), just fail to write any code for Apple OS? Puzzling. Baked Apples my eye.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BDizzleFizzle @ Apr 19th 2007 2:34PM
Does anyone care that they named it the same way Sony had named their earlier DAPs? The Connect thing was a Sony name for their integrated (yet failed) strategy. It was the name of their music store, too.
With all the law suits going on in this space, I'm really surprised that SanDisk used "Connect". If Apple did it, there'd be all kinds of hater stories about it, like when they used iPhone before getting the rights to do so.
Cupajo @ Apr 19th 2007 2:50PM
"not to mention the fact that Mac users are once again left out in the cold. "
*sniffle*
Oh, well. You baked Apples ought to be used to that by now.
TangoGolf @ Jan 28th 2008 10:18AM
Yeah whatever...but the thing is, why would a company like Sandisk, who could sell a ton of these things to Apple OSX users (who like all sorts of technology, not just Apple-brand), just fail to write any code for Apple OS? Puzzling. Baked Apples my eye.