If you compete with yourself, isn't that a win/win situation?
In order to compete, they would ahve to make a more intuitive media playe rthan iPod and price their songs at the same level or lower that iTunes. People buy the iPod because it's part media player, part sociall statement. If they make a removable battery, better life span, and a better UI, they might be able to compete toe to toe.
But if that player only works with MS software and audio/video content, that'll turn me off right there. At least when I buy an iPod, I have some give in what music service I choose to use.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
If you compete with yourself, isn't that a win/win situation?
In order to compete, they would ahve to make a more intuitive media playe rthan iPod and price their songs at the same level or lower that iTunes. People buy the iPod because it's part media player, part sociall statement. If they make a removable battery, better life span, and a better UI, they might be able to compete toe to toe.
But if that player only works with MS software and audio/video content, that'll turn me off right there. At least when I buy an iPod, I have some give in what music service I choose to use.